Jack of Harts

The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution states that people have a right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures. And that any warrant to seize them be submitted by an oath or affirmation describing the persons or things to be seized and the place to be searched. Like the others, this was ratified because the British had violated this idea rather greatly, and the Founders wanted to make certain our new government would not fall into the same practices as the one we had fought so long to get away from.

After God sent the flood to destroy nearly all life on Earth because of the wickedness that had infested it all, God sent a rainbow to Noah as a symbol of his promise to never wipe out the Earth again. Remember the rainbow. Remember the promise.

A judge who donated to the current president, and whose daughter is linked to fundraising efforts to raise millions of dollars of campaign funds for the president, has presided over a trial and a jury formed in one of the president’s most loyal voting districts, where the president’s challenger and previous president was found guilty of charges about accounting issues linked to fundraising efforts. Charges that expired years ago and could not be charged, unless another law was violated. According to the public charging documents and reports from inside the courtroom, the prosecution never revealed these underlying charges to the court and the judge did not allow the defense to bring in experts to argue what underlying laws may have been in question, or to even proactively argue them. Some reports say they revealed these underlying laws in final arguments, on the last day, after the defense had made its final arguments and could not argue the merits of the prosecution case, but that the jury’s verdict does not say what underlying laws they found him guilty of. Not all reports are clear at this time. But one thing is clear. The political show trials will continue.