Jack of Harts

We appear to have the shooter at Brown University, but there are still far too many questions and very little answers. Firstly, he appears to have been trained well in how to avoid detection by avoid phone tracking and using multiple license plates. Did he learn that on the Internet or did someone teach him?

How did he get the offshore accounts and money I’ve seen reported? What did he shout before shooting the Vice President of the local Republican student group in the head? Was the professor of the class in question a Jew as was reported earlier? Why did he shoot the Jewish professor days later? Why did he shoot himself? Why did local law enforcement never interview all the witnesses of the first shooting? What was going on with the first person of interest? Is this guy related to ISIS like the other shooters over that weekend? Was this part of a larger ISIS plot?

There are a great many questions we have and very few answers. Will they come? I don’t know. The local law enforcement have been long on self-congratulatory rhetoric and short on descriptive rhetoric. It does not lead me to trust them much. And without trust, are we even going to believe what they tell us when they finally have a narrative they want to tell us?

There is an old tale about a scorpion. In Russia it is known as the Scorpion and the Frog, and comes from Oriental sources. And there is a similar Persian tale named the Scorpion and the Turtle. The scorpion in the tale asks another animal to help it across a river or lake, and promises not to sting it because of course it would not be helpful to it. And the other animal trusts it and helps it across the body of water, only to be stung halfway across. And when asked why, the scorpion simply responds, “I am sorry, but I couldn’t help myself. It’s my character.” An interesting difference in the tales is that the frog dies, while the turtle’s armor shell allows it to survive the experience. But the scorpion is much the same between them and other similar stories.

The scorpion’s nature is to sting. It is his character. One should always expect a scorpion to sting you, and one should never be surprised when they do.

Now how does that apply today? The news cycle over the last day or two in America has been filled with news about a Vanity Fair article about the President and his people. The things they say about the administration and the people are not nice. And they picked some of the least flattering photos possible for many. Now the administration says that things were taken out of context. That they are, using the parlance of the day, misinformation. Purposefully using nuggets of truth to tell lies. And while I understand that point of view, I must ask them why?

Why did they agree to the interview at all? The Vanity Fair of today has been utterly taken over by the Democrat Party. I’m not surprised that Vanity Fair would deal dishonestly with us. Its nature today is to attack Republicans or anyone to the right of Mao Ze Dung. Its nature is to destroy anyone who stands against their agenda. Its nature is that of a scorpion. It will sting you. Why would you even deal with them when you should know what they will do? I don’t blame Vanity Fair for lying to us. I blame the administration for being stupid enough to believe they wouldn’t. I blame the administration for trusting them to act against their nature.

Never be surprised when a scorpion lives up to their nature. Expect it, and you will not be disappointed.

The Brown University shooting is very interesting. To begin with, there is very little information flowing out about it from official sources. They are being very cagey about it, and that usually means they don’t want us to know something. Not always, but usually. Secondly, they seem to be Keystone Cops with their loud trumpeting that they have a person of interest, and then not having them. That and other odd things coming from them makes it hard to figure out what is going on.

Things that we seem to know about it based on what I’ve read.

The professor of the class where the shooting took place was a Jew. Relevant to the ISIS/Hamas shootings of the weekend? Or coincidence?

The girl killed in the shooting was either the President or Vice President of the Young Republicans Club depending on the source. And she was shot in the head according to some sources. Was she the target? Or was the shot placement an accident while she was ducking for cover? Or are these reports totally false?

Brown University is one of the really big and rich universities with something like a Billion dollar endowment or so. How is it that they only have ONE camera that managed to catch the shooter? Is it that they don’t have as many cameras as we thought they did? Or did the shooter know where all the cameras were and avoid them?

The shooting took place in a building without internal cameras, on a Saturday when there is usually no one there. But this Saturday they were doing finals. So the shooter seems to have been very familiar with at least some camera placement and timing at least.

And of course, once again, this is a shooting in a gun free zone. Which by now we know equates to an invitation to crazy people to come shoot people since no one will be able to defend themselves. Democrat leaders are doing their normal thing and calling to disarm more citizens so the next shootings are even more deadly, but we have come to expect that of them. Does the day end in Y? If yes, they want to disarm Americans. Situation normal there.

So where does all of that lead? I don’t know. Call me very interested in how it fits into the other shootings over the weekend. If it does. And call me very interested in finding out why the local cops are so… unable to act like they have a clue in the world. I usually like to think the cops are at least competent, and in my experience they usually are. These guys seem to be breaking that trend. And that makes me curious about what is really going on there.